Procrastination

Tuesday, 16 February 2010, around seven in the evening.

When­ever there is real, seri­ous work to do (hint: always), I launch a cam­paign of unpro­duc­tive, semi-​​productive or (my favorite) productive-of-things-unrelated-to-what-I’m-supposed-to-be-doing work. This freshly-​​redesigned blog is in fact the prod­uct of hav­ing lots and lots of impor­tant papers to read. Nat­u­rally, I’m ulti­mately glad that I put the effort in, because not only does it give me an easy path to writ­ing for a (pre­tend) audi­ence, it gives me another thing that I arguably ought to be doing any­way, just not right now.

In fact, now that I’m think­ing about it, I feel like there ought to be a word for the kind of pro­duc­tiv­ity that is good and use­ful but totally ill-​​timed. Got any ideas? I haven’t enabled com­ments, and I’m not sure that I want to (which I guess means this isn’t a real blog), but my clever — if largely hypo­thet­i­cal — read­ers should be able to fig­ure out how to con­tact me. Or bet­ter, write your own damn blog entry about it. If you link to me, I’ll see it.

Any­way, my real rea­son for sit­ting down to write this — the fact that I actu­ally should be draft­ing a poster for the pho­net­ics lab aside — was to doc­u­ment the var­i­ous “alert lev­els” I typ­i­cally expe­ri­ence in the process of finally try­ing to focus on the impor­tant tasks at hand. It is in fact an impli­ca­tional hier­ar­chy: if the con­di­tions are met for a high alert level, you can count on the con­di­tions hav­ing been met for all the lower lev­els too:

  1. Low: Not a care in the world. This is my usual state.
  2. Guarded: Have acknowl­edge my Internet-​​induced ADD is inter­fer­ing with my work. Quit Tweetie.
  3. Ele­vated: Even with­out the con­stant updates from Twit­ter ensur­ing that I can’t pur­sue a train of thought for more than five min­utes at a time, I am altogether-​​too-​​frequently Command-​​Tabbing over to Net­NewsWire to see if any­one I care about on the Inter­net has pub­lished any­thing in the last few min­utes. Can’t be behind on the news, after all. Quit Net­NewsWire.
  4. High: I can still check Twit­ter and read blogs from the web. Plus, there is some­thing out there for all tastes, moods and lev­els of abject bore­dom. And then there’s Wikipedia. Quit Safari.
  5. Severe: At this point I feel like I need med­ica­tion to keep myself on track. Damn you Inter­net! The more steps I have to take to look up a pass­ing curi­ous thought on Wikipedia, the more oppor­tu­ni­ties I have to ask myself, “do I really need to know about the his­tory of term limit leg­is­la­tion in the United States Con­gress, when I’m sup­posed to be writ­ing about Bind­ing The­ory?” The answer is usu­ally “no.” Turn off my Inter­net con­nec­tion.

For all of this, what’s inter­est­ing to me is not the the­sis that the Inter­net has made me inca­pable of focus­ing on any­thing for more than five min­utes at a time. I don’t think that’s true. It’s that the Inter­net has so low­ered the bar­ri­ers between my think­ing “oh, hey, what about…” and my being able to learn more about what­ever ran­dom thing, that I just nat­u­rally tend towards com­plete dis­trac­tion. I won­der, is there a nat­ural limit to this? Or does the pat­tern hold such that the day that I get a direct feed to the Inter­net implanted in my brain, I will cease to func­tion alto­gether? I won­der if Wikipedia has any­thing to say about this…

(P.S. For bonus points, guess which alert level I’m at as I write this!).